Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2000-181
Original file (2000-181.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

FINAL DECISION 
BCMR Docket No. 2000-181 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 

 

 
 

 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

On September 6, 2000, the applicant asked the Board to correct his record by voiding a 
6-month extension contract he signed on December 2, 1998.  The contract shows that he was 
required to sign it to accept transfer orders to a patrol boat for a 2-year tour of duty that began 
on  January  4,  1999.    However,  his  record  shows  that  in  December  1998,  he  had  already 
obligated service through August 4, 2001, well beyond the 2-year tour of duty aboard the patrol 
boat.    Therefore,  under  Article  4.B.6.a.  of  the  Personnel  Manual,  he  should  not  have  been 
required to extend his enlistment in order to accept the transfer orders.  
 

On  December  7,  2000,  the  Chief  Counsel  of  the  Coast  Guard  recommended  that  the 

Board grant the applicant’s request.  
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS  

Under Article 4.B.6.a. of the Personnel Manual, the applicant was not required to extend 
his enlistment in December 1998 in order to accept transfer order to a patrol boat because he 
had already obligated sufficient service to complete a full 2-year tour of duty.  However, his 
extension  contract  indicates  he  was  erroneously  required  to  sign  it  to  accept  the  orders.  
Accordingly,  relief  should  be  granted  by  voiding  the  applicant’s  extension  contract  dated 
December 2, 1998.   

 

ORDER 

The  application  of  XXXXXXXXXX,  USCG,  for  correction  of  his  military  record  is 

 
 

 
Gloria Hardiman-Tobin 

granted.  His 6-month extension contract dated December 2, 1998, shall be null and void. 
 
 
 
Date:  1/25/01 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Nilza F. Velázquez 

 

 
 
John A. Kern 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2000-116

    Original file (2000-116.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On that day, the Chief Counsel alleged, the applicant would have been eligible for a Zone B SRB with a multiple of one.3 Therefore, the Chief Counsel recommended that the Board correct the applicant’s record to show that he reenlisted on November 9, 1997, for 6 years to receive the maximum authorized Zone B SRB for his rating. (4) of Enclosure (1) to the SRB Instruction states that, to be eligible for a Zone B SRB, members must “[b]e serving in pay grade E-5 or higher.” To receive a Zone A...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2000-154

    Original file (2000-154.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. He alleged that under Article 4.B.6.a.1., the applicant was required “to have sufficient obligated service to complete a full tour of duty upon reporting to his new unit.” The Chief Counsel alleged that under that article, members in pay grade E-4 or higher with less than six years of active service cannot receive PCS orders unless they have...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 1999-089

    Original file (1999-089.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated December 30, 1999, is signed by the three duly RELIEF REQUESTED The applicant, a xxx on active duty in the Coast Guard, asked the Board to correct his military record by changing the reason for extension recorded on an extension contract he signed on September 10, 1998, from “request of individual” to “obligated service for transfer.” The correction would entitle him to receive a larger Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for a 40-month extension he signed on...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2005-130

    Original file (2005-130.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2 Obligated service refers to all periods of military service covered by signed agreements in the form of enlistment contracts, reenlistment contracts and/or agreements to extend enlistment between Coast Guard members and the U.S. Coast Guard where members agree to serve for designated periods of time. When he received transfer orders in June 2003, the applicant should have been required to obligate sufficient service to complete a full tour of duty (four years) before accepting the...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-129

    Original file (2004-129.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated January 13, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record by canceling his 4- year reenlistment contract dated April 21, 2004, and replacing it with a 14-month extension contract. On April 17, 2002, the applicant enlisted in the regular Coast Guard for a term of 3 years, through April 16, 2005, and received a Zone A SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 485/01. On April 21, 2004, the...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2001-074

    Original file (2001-074.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The contract itself contains language acknowledging SRB counseling, but the SRB information is marked “NA.” Also on March 2, 1998, at 13:22 Greenwich Mean Time, the Commandant of the Coast Guard issued ALDIST 046/98, which allowed members in the DC rating to receive an SRB if they reenlisted or extended their current enlistments between April 1, 1998 and September 30, 1998. Therefore, he alleged, “it is highly unlikely that the Applicant’s unit had received ALDIST 046/98 at the time...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2005-165

    Original file (2005-165.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of the Coast Guard Training and Education Manual, before reporting to “A” school on January 22, 2000, she needed to obligate sufficient service — 19 more months — to complete the 14 weeks of school and have 26 months remaining on her enlistment upon completion of the school.3 Therefore, the applicant is entitled to have the term of her January 20, 2000, extension contract corrected to 19 months. The Board finds that if the applicant had been properly counseled regarding her SRB eligibility,...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 1999-094

    Original file (1999-094.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If the applicant produces such evidence, the Chief Counsel stated, the Board should correct his record by canceling the three-year reenlistment dated July 23, 1997, reinstating the seven-month extension, and creating a new six-year enlistment begin- ning on February 26, 1998, which would make him eligible for an SRB with a multiple of one-half under ALDIST 226/97. The Chief Counsel argued that the Board should grant relief in this case by voiding the July 23, 1997, reenlistment contract,...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-156

    Original file (2004-156.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated March 31, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, an operations specialist second class (OS2), asked the Board to correct his military record to make him entitled to a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) calculated with a multiple of 2.1 He alleged that, prior to being transferred to his current station on July 7, 2003, he was not properly counseled about his eligibility for an SRB when he signed a...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 1999-056

    Original file (1999-056.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AMENDED ORDER The Board’s order correcting the military record of XXXXX, USCG, is hereby amended to read as follows: Her record shall be corrected to show that on December 24, 1998, she reenlisted The extension contracts signed by the applicant on September 30, 1998, and for six years for the purpose of receiving an SRB with a multiple of three under ALDIST 290/98. 1999-056 The applicant, a xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on active duty in the Coast Guard, asked the Board to correct her military record by...